Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Larson's avatar

So I just read NFL.COM's pre-draft evaluation of Carson Bruener. Everything they said was wrong. :)

-Lacks NFL-caliber agility and athleticism.

-Lacks speed to play from sideline to sideline.

-Poor short-area quickness to tackle slashers.

-Short on range in coverage and is non-threatening as a blitzer.

-The evaluator did concede, however, that Bruener has a "powerful upper body."

Are they having some intern's little brother doing these evaluations?

---Lacks speed: Ran a 4.58 forty and plays faster than that. Jake Locker ran a 4.59 at the combine.

---Lacks NFL-caliber agility and athleticism: The opposite is true. Remember his acrobatic interceptions? Remember the way he ducked under blockers while maintaining speed and lateral quickness?

---Lacks sideline-to-sideline range? His 4.58 and standout navigation skills made this a real strength.

---Poor short-area quickness? Bruener could dodge a blocker and go low and lateral in an instant.

---Short on range in coverage? The film says the opposite. Hell, he's such a good athlete, he could have played safety.

---Bruener has a powerful upper body? Haha...I thought that was his only weakness, based on his slim arms and shoulder problems. But who knows, maybe the evaluator got that one thing right.

I'm stepping into touchy territory here, but I think some evaluations are guided by a racial stereotype. You know the one -- good white players get it done by being "heady" and having great work habits. That's an insult to all players.

Logdawg's avatar

After reading this list of (mostly) mediocre or un-tested QBs, I am thankful we have Demond Williams!

No posts

Ready for more?