Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tuengel's avatar

I know the real penalty would not have changed anything, but my more immature side wants Beck to be penalized more seriously for basically appearing out of nowhere for Moore, then doing what every player knows is an awful place to hit a runner. I have to think it wasn’t on purpose, but knowing you are not in the game at the snap and surprising a ball carrier down field with a tackle to the knee is a seriously bad decision.

Matt L.'s avatar

The difference (beauty) of the football rulebook [vs. any other major sport] is that those rules can morph/change every year, based on preventing an unwanted event experienced in a previous season, from happening again. You football junkies will know for example the weird and wonderful events that led to the very first 'illegal touching' penalty (see Carlisle Indian school vs. the big Ivy league teams at turn of the 20th century and preventing the new at that time, forward pass, from going to player who was pushed out of bounds). In this case, the rules ought to be changed next year to prevent players from entering game after the snap. This, because of the god-awful hit angle the Weber State player was able to inflict on Quentin. That angle very unlikely to occur if player was lined up as normal at snap, rather than lined up on the sideline and making a beeline entrance to meet cross-over pattern flowing in the direction of Weber State sideline.

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?