On Montlake

On Montlake

Share this post

On Montlake
On Montlake
House v. NCAA 101: What we know, and what we don't
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

House v. NCAA 101: What we know, and what we don't

An early FAQ on the basics of the landmark settlement, and how it might impact Washington.

Christian Caple's avatar
Christian Caple
Jun 13, 2025
∙ Paid
21

Share this post

On Montlake
On Montlake
House v. NCAA 101: What we know, and what we don't
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
9
Share

Beginning July 1, college athletic departments can begin paying athletes directly.

That much, we know.

But the landmark House v. NCAA settlement, approved last week by Judge Claudia Wilken, also comes with many unknowns, particularly with regard to revenue-sharing practices and enforcement.

Though schools have prepared for months to implement the settlement terms, questions remain — at Washington and across the country — about how money will be divided on each campus, and whether the newly created College Sports Commission will have the teeth necessary to enforce penalties against those who violate the new rules.

Consider this an early FAQ on how the settlement will impact Washington, with the caveat that we are still awaiting clarity on several key items — such as how the school will allot its non-football dollars.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Christian Caple
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More